The lower court carefully weighs the appellant’s private interests in remaining in Switzerland against the public interests in an expulsion order and assesses his situation as a whole (see consid. 1.3.1 et seq. above). It convincingly concludes that the public interests prevail. To avoid repetition, reference can be made to its reasoning. [...] In light of the foregoing, the expulsion order is lawful. The appellant rightly did not challenge the duration of 5 years, as it corresponds to the statutory minimum within the meaning of Art. 66a para. 1 SCC.