According to the case law, where there is a pronounced risk of absconding, reporting obligations, residence requirements, the blocking of documents or electronic monitoring are generally insufficient because they do not prevent an escape, but can at most establish it after the fact (see BGE 145 IV 503 E. 3.2 et seq.; judgment 7B_875/2026 of 29 July 2026 E. 5.3; each with references). As the lower court correctly explained, this also applies to the case to be assessed here.